Subjective Due Process as a Legal Standard: Using Lay Judgments as a Basis for Evaluating Emerging Remote and Impersonal Civil Procedures

Engineering notes

Key topics: autonomous driving. See the paper for implementation details and experimental results.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为端到端自动驾驶、BEV感知、3D目标检测、轨迹预测、路径规划、LiDAR感知等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

The forums through which the civil justice system operates are rapidly changing toward the adoption of remote and impersonal procedures. These changes are being driven by efforts to manage large case loads through a system which has limited resources. Authorities supporting these evolving forums suggest that they respond to litigant concerns for rapid and inexpensive case management procedures. A review of research suggests that, in contrast to this perspective, people are actually very sensitive to whether they believe they receive due process. Such due process concerns have been identified through the literature of procedural justice. They reflect four judgments about a procedure: does it allow voice; is it neutral; does it treat those involved with dignity; and is there evidence that the motives of the authorities are trustworthy (sincere, benevolent). Many of those who have experienced newer remote or impersonal procedures raise concerns about whether these new procedures address their due process concerns. This suggests that gains in speed and cost need to be balanced against potential declines in public trust and confidence in the courts resulting from litigants’ feeling that they experienced injustice on the part of the courts.

Links and sources

• PDF from original source

Comments