Proximal Policy Optimization in Autonomous Driving: A Systematic Review of Methods, Imitation Learning, and Evaluation Practices

Engineering notes

Our findings underscore the need for standardized benchmarks, sim-to-real transfer methods, and improved reporting transparency.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为端到端自动驾驶、BEV感知、3D目标检测、轨迹预测、路径规划、LiDAR感知等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

The development of robust decision-making policies for road-based autonomous vehicles (AV) remains a critical research challenge. While Reinforcement Learning (RL) and Imitation Learning (IL) show promise, the research landscape remains fragmented, particularly regarding Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). This paper presents a systematic literature review synthesizing PPO applications in autonomous driving. Following the Kitchenham methodology and SEGRESS guidelines, we searched major digital libraries for studies published between 2021 and 2025. From 108 initial records, a rigorous selection process yielded 26 primary studies. Our analysis reveals that standard PPO dominates (73.1%), with modified variants accounting for 23.1%. CARLA serves as the primary evaluation platform (50.0%), with urban driving (42.3%) and lane changing (30.8%) being the most common tasks. IL integration employed diverse approaches including Behavioral Cloning, GAIL, and AIRL. A significant finding is evaluation fragmentation, with 14 unique metrics identified, though collision rate (57.7%) and success rate (30.8%) were most prevalent. Quality assessment showed 46.2% of studies achieved high methodological quality, while transparency emerged as the weakest criterion. Our findings underscore the need for standardized benchmarks, sim-to-real transfer methods, and improved reporting transparency.

Links and sources

Comments