Autonomous driving paper index

Perceived Environmental Benefits and Electric Vehicle Intentions in Canada: Separate Analyses of Car Owners’ Purchase Likelihood and Non-Car Owners’ Stated Preference

2026-08-07 · World Electric Vehicle Journal

autonomous driving

One-line summary

Believing that electric vehicles (EVs) benefit the environment may be associated with EV intentions, but current car owners and non-car owners answer different practical questions.

Engineering notes

Key topics: autonomous driving. See the paper for implementation details and experimental results.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充:本站会优先为端到端自动驾驶、BEV感知、3D目标检测、轨迹预测、路径规划、LiDAR感知等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Believing that electric vehicles (EVs) benefit the environment may be associated with EV intentions, but current car owners and non-car owners answer different practical questions. This cross-sectional online survey of 328 adults residing in Canada therefore analyzes the groups separately. The focal item—“The use of EVs will help protect the environment”—is treated as a perceived environmental benefit of EVs rather than as a validated general environmental-concern scale. For 226 car owners with complete focal variables, an ordered logistic model including personal environmental responsibility produced an odds ratio (OR) of 1.82 per one-category increase in perceived environmental benefit (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51–2.19; p < 0.001). The association remained positive in the available demographic sensitivity model (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.68–2.51). For 72 non-car owners, the parsimonious exploratory model produced an OR of 1.47 (95% CI 1.04–2.08; p = 0.029), but the estimate was attenuated after broader demographic adjustment (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.96–2.02; p = 0.080). Cluster-robust stacked cumulative-logit diagnostics found no evidence against proportional odds in the primary models. Because owners reported five-category purchase likelihood for a plug-in electric vehicle and non-owners reported seven-category stated EV preference, no formal group comparison was conducted. The findings are associational, based on single items and a non-probability sample, and are consistent only with selected propositions of Value–Belief–Norm theory. Evidence is strongest for a positive owner–context association and suggestive, but less stable, for non-car owners.

5.0Engineering value
7.0Research novelty
5.0Business relevance

Links and sources

Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?

Full Self Driving can prepare a custom autonomous driving literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.

Request B2B research

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this paper.
Login or register to leave a comment