Autonomous driving paper index
Non-explicit Coordination Failure Induced by Autonomous Vehicles: Evidence from Waymo
One-line summary
Although human-driven vehicles (HVs) tend to follow autonomous vehicles (AVs) more stably, this stability comes at a cost: HVs must maintain continuous attention and perform frequent micro-adjustments that conflict with their expectations and habitual driving patterns.
Engineering notes
The results show that a random forest model achieves approximately 96% classification accuracy, indicating a highly separable structural difference between AVLVs and SLVs in the behavioral space.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充:本站会优先为端到端自动驾驶、BEV感知、3D目标检测、轨迹预测、路径规划、LiDAR感知等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
Although human-driven vehicles (HVs) tend to follow autonomous vehicles (AVs) more stably, this stability comes at a cost: HVs must maintain continuous attention and perform frequent micro-adjustments that conflict with their expectations and habitual driving patterns. As a result, driver discomfort accumulates under seemingly smooth traffic conditions, which may paradoxically increase latent risk and contribute to rear-end collisions. We define this phenomenon as non-explicit coordination failure (NECF). Using the Waymo Open Dataset, this study systematically identifies and quantifies the NECF pattern induced by AV driving in no-lane-change, straight car-following scenarios. By constructing a lateral control framework, vehicles traveling in the same lane as the AV (AVLVs) are treated as the affected group, while vehicles one lane away from the AV (SLVs) serve as a weakly affected baseline. We conduct a comparative analysis of longitudinal car-following characteristics and frequency-domain features between these two groups. Furthermore, random forest, logistic regression, and support vector machine models are employed to diagnose whether HVs undergo systematic restructuring under AV-imposed following constraints. The results show that a random forest model achieves approximately 96% classification accuracy, indicating a highly separable structural difference between AVLVs and SLVs in the behavioral space. SHAP-based interpretability analysis reveals that, compared with SLVs, AVLVs exhibit more stable longitudinal following and lower instantaneous conflict risk, but also more frequent high-frequency, small-amplitude speed adjustments and more constrained speed autonomy. This coexistence of “stable following and high-frequency micro-adjustments” suggests that, under persistent longitudinal constraints imposed by AVs, HVs gain stability at the expense of local coordination efficiency. This study uncovers a previously overlooked mechanism of NECF triggered by mismatched human–machine driving styles in mixed traffic, providing new empirical evidence for mixed traffic flow modeling and the design of AV control strategies.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Full Self Driving can prepare a custom autonomous driving literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments