Autonomous driving paper index
Mental Health, Gender-Based Violence, and the New Section 33.1
One-line summary
This article examines Parliamentary debates, evidence before the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, legal scholarship, and case law to compare interpretations of the defence of self-induced extreme intoxication codified in section 33.1 of the Criminal Code.
Engineering notes
Key topics: autonomous driving. See the paper for implementation details and experimental results.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充：本站会优先为端到端自动驾驶、BEV感知、3D目标检测、轨迹预测、路径规划、LiDAR感知等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
This article examines Parliamentary debates, evidence before the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, legal scholarship, and case law to compare interpretations of the defence of self-induced extreme intoxication codified in section 33.1 of the Criminal Code. It analyzes whether the new provision can appease competing claims in this area of the law. It pays specific attention to the need to protect women against intoxicated violence and the criminalization of mental illness. For this purpose, the article dissects three requirements of the extreme intoxication defence: the lack of voluntariness, the type of evidence establishing an automatism claim under R. v. Stone, and the dual foresight requirement under section 33.1(2) (that is, foresight of extreme intoxication and harm to another person).
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Full Self Driving can prepare a custom autonomous driving literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments