Autonomous driving paper index
Development and validation of World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 for persons with disabilities having community rehabilitation services in Hong Kong
One-line summary
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a generic instrument aligned with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
Engineering notes
Key topics: autonomous driving. See the paper for implementation details and experimental results.
Chinese explanation / 中文解读
中文解读待补充：本站会优先为端到端自动驾驶、BEV感知、3D目标检测、轨迹预测、路径规划、LiDAR感知等高价值论文补充中文说明。
Original abstract
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a generic instrument aligned with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Existing Chinese versions are not fully applicable to the Hong Kong sociolinguistic context. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and preliminarily evaluate the psychometric properties of a Hong Kong Traditional Chinese version of WHODAS 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0 TC-HK). METHODS: WHODAS 2.0 was translated using forward-backward procedures. A convenience sample of 177 adults with disabilities receiving community rehabilitation services completed WHODAS 2.0 TC-HK, the SF-36 TC-HK, and WHOQOL-BREF TC-HK. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and concurrent validity were examined. Construct validity was explored using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) based on the original six-domain model. RESULTS: Internal consistency was good across domains (Cronbach's α = 0.86-0.89). Test-retest reliability was moderate to good (ICC = 0.59-0.87). WHODAS 2.0 TC‑HK showed moderate negative correlations with SF‑36 TC‑HK and WHOQOL‑BREF TC‑HK domains, supporting convergent and concurrent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis of the 32‑item version demonstrated suboptimal model fit, indicating only partial support for the original factor structure. CONCLUSIONS: WHODAS 2.0 TC‑HK demonstrates good reliability and acceptable convergent and concurrent validity among adults receiving community rehabilitation services in Hong Kong. However, structural validity of the instrument remains preliminary and requires further investigation in larger and more diverse samples, particularly for the complete 36‑item version.
Links and sources
Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?
Full Self Driving can prepare a custom autonomous driving literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.
Request B2B research
Comments