Comparison of federated learning frameworks for discrete event manufacturing systems

Engineering notes

Results show that TFF achieves slightly higher predictive performance in terms of accuracy and F-score, while Flower and PySyft exhibit very similar model behavior.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为端到端自动驾驶、BEV感知、3D目标检测、轨迹预测、路径规划、LiDAR感知等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

Abstract In manufacturing domains such as the aeronautical sector, where operational data can be sensitive, federated learning provides an architectural approach for collaborative model training across multiple production sites while keeping raw data local. This paper presents a comparative analysis of three widely used frameworks for Federated Learning: Flower, TensorFlow Federated (TFF) and PySyft. The evaluation focuses on deployment complexity and performance within a real-world industrial use case involving two large-scale machining centers dedicated to aeronautical component manufacturing, in particular to predict their power consumption. Key performance metrics, including loss, accuracy and F-score, alongside execution time and computational resource usage, are evaluated to capture the practical trade-offs of each framework under realistic deployment conditions. Results show that TFF achieves slightly higher predictive performance in terms of accuracy and F-score, while Flower and PySyft exhibit very similar model behavior. At the system level, Flower demonstrates lower training time in distributed settings compared to PySyft. In terms of usability, TFF simplifies single-machine deployment, while Flower better balances scalability in distributed settings. Based on these findings, the study provides practical guidance for selecting appropriate federated learning frameworks in industrial settings where data-locality requirements, heterogeneity, and infrastructure constraints are critical factors.

Links and sources

• PDF from original source

Comments