Autonomous driving paper index

An efficient motion planning framework for four-wheel steering autonomous vehicles using Lazy Edge-Based A* and adaptive RK4-MPC

2026-07-04 · Mechatronics Electrical Power and Vehicular Technology

autonomous drivingautonomous vehiclemotion planningpath planningplanningcontrol

One-line summary

This work presents an efficient motion planning framework for four-wheel steering (4WS) autonomous vehicles operating in complex and unknown environments.

Engineering notes

The integration of adaptive RK4-MPC with WFDC achieves the lowest tracking error and heading error of 34.8 % and 37.5 % compared to OMNI, and 28.6 % compared to S-4WS. For computational efficiency, the proposed framework achieves a search time of 0.5234 s, 83.1 % faster than OMNI, and 37.1 % faster than S-4WS, and an optimization time of 1.4892 s, 30.3 % faster than S-4WS.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充:本站会优先为端到端自动驾驶、BEV感知、3D目标检测、轨迹预测、路径规划、LiDAR感知等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

This work presents an efficient motion planning framework for four-wheel steering (4WS) autonomous vehicles operating in complex and unknown environments. To improve planning efficiency, the framework employs a lazy edge-based A* (LEA*) algorithm for global path planning, adaptive fourth-order Runge–Kutta model predictive control (RK4-MPC) for trajectory tracking and motion execution, and wheel force distribution control (WFDC) to ensure stable motion during steering maneuvers. Quantitative results show that the LEA* reduces planning time by 87.5 % edge evaluations by 96.1 % compared to conventional A*, while improving path smoothness by 51 %. The integration of adaptive RK4-MPC with WFDC achieves the lowest tracking error and heading error of 34.8 % and 37.5 % compared to OMNI, and 28.6 % compared to S-4WS. In addition, the proposed method reduces the wheel slip ratio 88.4 % better than OMNI and 46.7 % better than S-4WS, while also reducing yaw acceleration by 50 % compared to both baselines. For computational efficiency, the proposed framework achieves a search time of 0.5234 s, 83.1 % faster than OMNI, and 37.1 % faster than S-4WS, and an optimization time of 1.4892 s, 30.3 % faster than S-4WS. Overall, the proposed framework improves motion planning efficiency while maintaining smooth and stable motion in simulation.

5.0Engineering value
7.0Research novelty
5.0Business relevance

Links and sources

Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?

Full Self Driving can prepare a custom autonomous driving literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.

Request B2B research

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this paper.
Login or register to leave a comment