Autonomous driving paper index

A Taxonomization and Comparative Evaluation of Targetless Camera-Lidar Calibration for Autonomous Vehicles

2024-09-24 · 2024 IEEE 27th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)

autonomous drivingautonomous vehicle3d object detectionobject detectionlidarsensor fusionmulti-sensor fusionperception

One-line summary

In this paper, we taxonomize the leading targetless calibration methods into three categories based on their underlying algorithms, namely feature, information theory, and learning-based methods.

Engineering notes

With the falling cost of multi-sensor fusion hardware, namely camera and lidar, combined with state-of-the-art fusion-based detection algorithms, camera-lidar data produce superior perception results. We also find that most recent learning-based camera-lidar calibration methods lead to equivalent or superior 3D object detection performance when compared with state-of-the-art feature and information theory-based calibration methods.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充:本站会优先为端到端自动驾驶、BEV感知、3D目标检测、轨迹预测、路径规划、LiDAR感知等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

The state of the art in autonomous vehicle technology has been advanced due to progress in multiple disciplines, including multi-modal object detection algorithms. With the falling cost of multi-sensor fusion hardware, namely camera and lidar, combined with state-of-the-art fusion-based detection algorithms, camera-lidar data produce superior perception results. However, fusing camera and lidar data requires known extrinsic calibration parameters to properly combine these modalities, which can change during an autonomous vehicle's operation. In this paper, we taxonomize the leading targetless calibration methods into three categories based on their underlying algorithms, namely feature, information theory, and learning-based methods. To showcase the impact of selecting a specific automatic targetless calibration method, we evaluate the robustness of each specific method in the context of multi-modal object detection. We demonstrate that the effects of miscalibration can cause severe degradations in performance, even with seemingly small changes in calibration parameters. We also find that most recent learning-based camera-lidar calibration methods lead to equivalent or superior 3D object detection performance when compared with state-of-the-art feature and information theory-based calibration methods. To the best of our knowledge, this work represents a first attempt at analyzing the impact of camera-lidar miscalibration on the performance of multi-modal object detection frameworks.

5.0Engineering value
8.0Research novelty
5.0Business relevance

Links and sources

Need this topic turned into a technical roadmap?

Full Self Driving can prepare a custom autonomous driving literature review, code map, dataset map, and B2B technology assessment.

Request B2B research

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this paper.
Login or register to leave a comment