A Simulation-Based Approach to ASIL Determination for Longitudinal Motion Hazards Using Combined Operational Situations

Engineering notes

Key topics: autonomous driving, control. See the paper for implementation details and experimental results.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为端到端自动驾驶、BEV感知、3D目标检测、轨迹预测、路径规划、LiDAR感知等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

With the increasing complexity of electrical and electronic (E/E) components in modern powertrains, functional safety requires more systematic assessment methods. This paper presents a simulation-based approach for automated Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA) of battery electric vehicles in accordance with ISO 26262. The method combines operational-situation parameters, including vehicle speed, road surface, vehicle gap, and road inclination, to define a structured set of hazardous events. Severity, Exposure, and Controllability are evaluated using rule-based criteria, including a dedicated Controllability rule set for longitudinal motion hazards. Quantitative erroneous acceleration and deceleration thresholds associated with different ASILs are derived using a bisection search algorithm, enabling quantifiable and testable safety goals. Comparison with manual HARA reveals systematic biases: low speed does not necessarily imply improved Controllability due to shorter vehicle gaps, while Severity may be underestimated at low speeds because of high instantaneous electric-machine torque. The maximum ASIL is often identified similarly by simulation and experts, whereas lower-ASIL hazardous events may lack consistency and coverage in manual HARA. As a practical application, the approach can be integrated into existing automotive safety workflows as a HARA support tool, improving the consistency of lower-ASIL events while allowing engineers to focus on maximum ASIL cases.

Links and sources

• PDF from original source

Comments